Local News and Views - Archive
(Jan 2003 - June 2004)
Emergency Planning For Kislingbury
(March 2004)
If you would like to volunteer to help in a village emergency - i.e. if you have First Aid skills etc,
please contact Gerry Crawford on 831672 or e-mail gerry.crawford@831672.com
so he can make a note of your details.
Dog Fouling
(March 2004)
Now the summer is approaching, please dog owners don't let there be an increase of mess on the paths!!!!!!
A village parent
By E-Mail
POLICE MATTERS - ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR
(February 2004)
I wish to bring to parents' attention, my concern over the increasing number of complaints being made to Police, over the behaviour of many young people living within Kislingbury, whose behaviour has at best been described as anti-social.
The main areas of youth activity are centred on the village Playing Field and their recent chosen meeting place; Church Lane, near to the junction with Mill Road.
Complaints made in relation to the group of young people meeting in Church Lane include skateboarding and cycling over peoples' driveways and gardens, causing damage to grass verges and roadside furniture (i.e. a lamp post), consuming alcohol, dropping litter, spitting, noise and continual use of obscene language.
As you will be aware, the Kislingbury Playing Field Committee and village residents have spent a great deal of time and money providing the facilities now in place on the Playing Field. The KPFA have to constantly find funding to deal with vandalism and to maintain this important village facility.
Residents living in these areas have been subjected to anti-social behaviour on almost a daily basis over recent months, which cannot be permitted to continue. If you are the parent of a teenager, who spends much of his/her free time "out with friends" in the village, please ensure that your child is not responsible for this kind of behaviour.
Northamptonshire Police will be monitoring this situation and positive action will be taken against individuals, should evidence of an offence be found.
G.J.Wilmore
Police Constable 762
Community Beat Officer
Litter
(16th September 2003)
The following is an e-mail from a newcomer to the village ...
Having moved into Kislingbury in January of this year, life could not have got any better. As a whole the experience has been positive, but unfortunately there is a problem, and it's Litter. We live next to the bus shelter, and on a daily basis I have to pick up more litter than I could have possibly imagined! Yesterday I picked up a litre coke bottle, which had been thrown onto our grass verge at the weekend, along with numerous sweet and crisp packets. Could I ask that people just take their rubbish home with them just like most of us do.
Message from Northamptonshire Police re 'Gopeds'
(5th September 2003)
ADVICE TO YOUNG GOPED RIDERS
A rise in the number of incidents involving gopeds has led to officers from Northamptonshire Police to express concerns that youngsters are riding these vehicles ignorant of the legal situation surrounding this means of transport.
What is a Goped?
A Goped is quite simply a motorised scooter. It has two wheels and is powered either by means of an electric motor or a petrol engine. The introduction of this new means of transport is not yet covered by legislation but it is nonetheless classed as a motor vehicle.
As far as the Road Traffic Act 1988 is concerned, a motor vehicle is a mechanically propelled vehicle that has been designed or adapted for use on a road. This being the case, a Goped, which can travel at speeds of between 10mph and 18mph, is categorised as a mechanically propelled vehicle, as it is intended for use on roads within the meaning of the statute.
After consultation with the Ministry Of Transport it would appear that the majority of Goped scooters that are being used on the road are not even constructed to the required standard for road use. There is believed to be only one type of Goped scooter which has received approval as a moped and which can, therefore, be legally registered and used on the roads of the UK.
In terms of the Road Traffic Act of 1988, a goped is treated as a moped, and therefore, before it can be used on a road, has to comply with the following standards;
(1) The rider must be 16 years of age (The minimum age for riding a moped)
(2) The rider must have a Certificate of Basic Training
(3) The vehicle must have a suitable policy of insurance, which offers at least Third Party cover
(4) The rider must wear appropriate safety clothing i.e. a helmet
(5) The vehicle must hold a certificate of registration
(6) The rider must have road tax for the vehicle
(7) The rider must hold an MOT Certificate for the vehicle (Once three years old)
Police would like to remind owners of gopeds, including parents of children with gopeds, that there are strict laws, which need to be adhered to before a motorised scooter can be used on a road.
Although some people would argue that using them on a footpath is harmless, it still breaches current legislation, and we have to consider pedestrians, particularly the elderly and disabled.
In any event, traffic law defines footpaths alongside a road as forming part of the highway and anyone operating a mechanically propelled vehicle on the highway needs the appropriate driving licence, etc.
Police are also reminding youngsters that if they are prosecuted for operating a goped without the appropriate licence, it will affect their eventual application for a driving licence.
Can you help?
(19th August 2003)
The following is an e-mail from a reader of the website ...
Along with my partner Felicity I recently moved into the village from
Hackleton via a brief spell in East Hunsbury. It's great to be back in a
village again.
In November last year we moved into 4 Bugbrooke Road which according to some
post received was called "The Old Cottage", "Mission Cottage" or just plain
No 4. So the reason for my email was to ask if you knew or any visitors to
your site knew any background to the history of the house.
As far as the estate agents were concerned No 4 was a barn conversion
carried out in the late 1980's whereas the previous owners informed us that
it was two cottages that became derelict and were rebuilt during 1998.
We do have an aerial photograph of the area when the surrounding barns were
still part of the farm but it is unclear what was under the roof.
I do intend to start tracing the history of the "Building" through document
evidence but word of mouth is always a great start as I found when tracing
my family tree.
Hope you can help or have some ideas of where I can start.
Regards
Paul Mills
If you can help Paul, please complete the comments form with any information you have and I will pass it on to him.
Parish Council Election 2003
(May 2003)
The results of the Kislingbury Parish Council Election held on 1st May 2003 are as follows:
- Delphine Tidmarsh
- Gordon Seal
- Harold Green
- Gerald Crawford
- Ian Burrage
- George James
- Keith Durham
- Pauline Cook
- Leslie Kingston
- Robert Middleton
The first post-election Parish Council meeting (which is the AGM) is at 8 pm on Tuesday 13
May 2003 in the Village Hall.
Can you get Broadband in Bugbrooke or Kislingbury?
(31st January 2003)
No not yet, but if you register your interest for the service, it will arrive here sooner rather than later.
Click here to view the Progress Thermometer
For more information on this subject, log onto www.workingwithyou.co.uk, which will take you to the BT broadband site where you can see the status of the 'Interest Thermometer' and further explanation of what's involved.
As soon as the thermometer hits the 200 mark, it should trigger BT into scheduling the Kislingbury exchange for upgrading with the necessary digital equipment.
Pass the word around and we may soon see the addition of Kislingbury Exchange on the BT Broadband Upgrade Table.
Simon Evans
Resignation of the Editor of Kislingbury News
(25th January 2003)
To: Ken Tonge, Chairman
Kislingbury News Management Committee
3 Church Lane
Kislingbury
Dear Ken
My Resignation as Editor of Kislingbury News
A year ago the Management Committee appointed me as the Editor of
Kislingbury News. Since I wanted to satisfy myself that there would be no
unwarranted constraints or conditions placed on my Editorship, I agreed to
do the job for a 12 months trial period.
You will recall that, at the first meeting of the Management Committee, I
asked if there was any laid down structure for the management of Kislingbury
News. Committee members told me there were no rules. The Editor got on with
the job of editing but discussed issues of policy with the Management
Committee which had the final say. The Chair of the Management Committee
called meetings as and when they were necessary. The Management Committee
consisted of
- one Kislingbury Parish Council representative
- one former member of Kislingbury Parish Council
- two Kislingbury villagers as lay members
- the Editor
On this basis I was happy to be the Editor of Kislingbury News - a monthly
publication produced voluntarily by the people of Kislingbury, about the
people of Kislingbury, for the people of Kislingbury.
At the end of June 2002 a Kislingbury News reader contacted me and suggested
creating a web site for Kislingbury which he offered to make the Kislingbury
News web site. Before taking any further action, I raised this at a
Management Committee meeting on 8 July. The Committee decided that
Kislingbury News should not have a web site but if anyone wished to
independently create a web site for the Village, that was a private matter
for them. Since Kislingbury Parish Council provides funding for Kislingbury
News the Management Committee decided to report this development to the
Parish Council.
In a letter from its Clerk dated 17 July 2002 I was invited to go to a
Kislingbury Parish Council Meeting on 12 August to "discuss future plans"
for Kislingbury News. In this letter the Clerk asserted that Kislingbury
Parish Council was the "proprietor" of Kislingbury News. This was the first
I knew of the Parish Council's claim to own Kislingbury News.
At the Parish Council Meeting it was apparent the main concern was the
possibility of a web site. Some Parish Council members very strongly
objected to their telephone numbers appearing on a web site and were
generally opposed to a Kislingbury web site. I explained that, since the
Management Committee had decided against it, Kislingbury News would not be
having its own web site.
Without reference to Kislingbury News Management Committee, the Parish
Council subsequently discussed the management of Kislingbury News and
drafted a set of "Kislingbury News Management Rules."
I later received a letter from the Clerk to Kislingbury Parish Council dated
1 October 2002 again asserting that the Parish Council was the "proprietor"
of Kislingbury News and enclosing the "Kislingbury News Management Rules."
These included, "The office of Editor shall in future be termed Compiler and
shall take effect from January 2003." They also included an unsigned resume
of the history of Kislingbury News a part of which read, "There is no
constitution, or set of rules, to regulate the actions of the Committee."
Since I strongly objected to this unilateral action I contacted the
Kislingbury News Management Committee Chair and asked her to convene a
Management Committee meeting to discuss this turn of events.
About this time the two Kislingbury lay members resigned from the Management
Committee. At its meeting on 21 October there were the original Kislingbury
Parish Council representative, a new Parish Council representative and me.
(The former member of Kislingbury Parish Council did not attend.)
I explained my very strong objection to what I see as inappropriate
interference on the part of Kislingbury Parish Council. Various
organisations and individuals within the Village contribute financially to
the running of Kislingbury News. Funding comes from paid advertisements. The
Parish Council also contributes funding. This does NOT make it "proprietor."
Neither is it "proprietor" simply because it asserts ownership.
My view is that I was appointed Editor of Kislingbury News a local
publication originated by the Church but principally run by volunteers from
the Village. No organisation or body can arbitrarily impose rules or assert
ownership of such an enterprise which in my view belongs to the people of
Kislingbury. The management of Kislingbury News should be the sole
responsibility of a properly constituted Management Committee with an
appropriate number of lay members to represent the views of Villagers.
I explained that, at best, it was inappropriate of the Parish Council to
discuss the management of Kislingbury News without the courtesy of inviting
the Editor or any lay member of the Management Committee to such
discussions.
I asked the Parish Council members who were also Management Committee
members for more detail about the Parish Council discussions on the future
of Kislingbury News including the process by which the "Kislingbury News
Management Rules" had been produced and what the term "Compiler" meant. They
declined to give me any information saying such discussion, albeit directly
affecting the role of the Kislingbury News Editor, was "confidential". This
placed me, as Editor, in the potentially untenable position of undertaking a
role without proper explanation of what it involved.
At this Kislingbury News Management Committee meeting, and at a subsequent
meeting on 9 December, 2002, I refused to accept that Kislingbury Parish
Council is the "proprietor" of Kislingbury News or can arbitrarily impose
"rules." I also refused to accept the Management Committee was now
constitutionally formed since it had no truly lay Village members. The
Parish Council members who were now in the majority could therefore vote
through any proposition they wished. This takes the management of
Kislingbury News away from the people of Kislingbury and places it in the
hands of the Parish Council. Effectively Kislingbury News becomes an organ
of the Parish Council.
This is entirely unacceptable to me. Since I am in the minority and my
objections are not being properly addressed, I am left with no alternative
but to resign as Editor. I take this decision with a sad heart since I enjoy
editing Kislingbury News and feel I still have a contribution to make. In my
view, if Kislingbury News is to improve and make progress those who manage
it must be open to new ideas and willing to challenge and be challenged in
an atmosphere of mutual support.
This letter is open since I owe it to the people of Kislingbury to explain
the reasons behind my decision to resign and what is happening at
Kislingbury News.
Finally, I thank you and everyone who has given me help, support and
messages of encouragement over the past year in my role as Editor.
Yours with regret
Gerry Crawford
Editor
23 Hall Close, Kislingbury
tele 831672 fax 08700 780520
email gerry.crawford@virtualcollege.co.uk